Submission of an article implies that the work describes has not been previously, that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. That, if accepted will not be published elsewhere in the same form in English or in any other language. The editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise after all contributions, but autors will receive proof for approval before publication. Copyrights for articles published in Journal HUMAN are retained by the authors with first publication rights granted to the journal. In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field. There should be a discernible reason why the work deserves the visibility of publication in journal rather than the best of the specialist journals.
Peer review policy-Review Process
All submitted manuscripts are read by the editorial staff to save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. Those papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advices from specialists in the field). The journal uses single blind system. The reviewers identities remain anonymous to authors while the reviewers can see authors identities. Two reviewers from outside and one editor from the journal typically involve in reviewing an submission.The review process usually takes 2 weeks since submission time.
Open Access Policy
This journal provide immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely avaliable to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Every author will have to sign the Declaration of Conflicting Interests in order to be considered for publication.