Open Access Policy: By agreeing with immediate Open Access policy of paper publications author gives permission for making final version of paper available online to readers without any embargo period.

Double Blind Fold Review: Our Editorial Board consult with academicians, professors, researchers, consultants across world. Supervising Editor of the Journal is Fully Responsible for acceptance or rejection of paper.

What is peer review, and what do you need to know? 

Editor assessment

Peer review follows a number of stages, beginning with submitting your article to a journal. At this first, the journal editor will decide if it’s suitable for the journal, asking questions such as:

Has the author followed the journal’s guidelines?

Is this the right journal for this article?

Will the journal’s readers find it interesting and useful?

The editor might reject the article immediately, or will move to the next step, and into peer review.

The editor will find and contact two other researchers or academics who are experts in your field. They will be asked to read your article, and advise the editor whether to publish your paper in that journal.

So what are they looking for?

Your work is original or new;

Your study design and methodology are appropriate and described so that others could replicate what you’ve done;

You’ve presented your results clearly and appropriately;

Your conclusions are reliable and significant.

You’ll then be given feedback about your article, telling you if any changes need to be made before it can be published. Reviewers’ comments can be extremely helpful, ensuring that the article is of a high quality. Please note the final editorial decision on a paper and the choice of who to invite to review is always at the editor’s discretion.

You can then amend your article based on the reviewers’ comments, resubmitting it with a changes made.

If you decide you don’t want to accept all the reviewers’ comments, you can include a brief explanation of why you disagree.

Every research article published in a Hrr journal has been through peer review as outlined in the journal’s aims and scope information; its quality, validity, and relevance assessed by independent peers within the relevant field.

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees, and consequent revision by article authors when required. The published article constitutes the final, definitive, and citable Version of Scholarly Record.

Plagiarism Policy: All authors are advised not to use any kind of Plagiarism content in their article. Use of content containing any kind of Plagiarism, hatred speech and unlawful material leads to rejection of article.